Adam’s Peace

Edit: By the way, for those of you reading the feeds only, there’s more information in the comments.

The Tag

Slade has tasked me, as well as several other people, to respond to a tag that he has created.

The tag is designed to get his readers to stop and think about their relationship with money, and to install a healthy relationship.

This is a very object-oriented exercise, but as most people out there don’t program computers, I’ll leave the technical jargon out of it.

The task at hand is to personify your concept of Money, and identify its human qualities, then to create a new concept of money that you can have a healthy relationship with.

Old Money

Several people have already taken part in this tag, and have described their old money as the filthy rich, who care nothing about individuals, only about its own appearances. I can certainly see that as a good description of money, as far as most of society sees it. I tried to visualize Money in an Armani suit, teasing me with the promise of riches if I could just feed his ego, yet never quit delivering.

It didn’t work. That wasn’t my relationship with Money at all. It was close, but not close enough.

Instead of an Armani suit, he wore torn, old rags. Instead of feeding his ego, I had to feed his addiction. Old Money, to me, is a drug addict, and I got as much out of him as anyone can expect to get from a drug addict. He talked cool and made promises, but all too often, I saw him slumped in a corner with a blank stare on his face, with all of his dreams torn and shattered, in peices on the floor around them, as he had to scavenge them to get just one more fix and fight one more craving. He wasn’t even happy to be high anymore, he was just deathly afraid of the withdrawal, and his few lucid moments were spent gathering the resources he needed just to fight off another craving. His addiction was becoming more and more expensive, and he couldn’t function normally any more… I was there to enable him to keep up his addiction, and he loved me for it, but he couldn’t repay me in any way, not even emotionally any more.

New Money

Slade’s experiment really opened my eyes… Who ever thought of personifying an abstract concept like money? After identifying what I saw money as, I began to work on finding a new Money who I could have a relationship with. I don’t care about the gender, or their appearance… What I’m looking for in the personification of money is a person who doesn’t need me, but enjoys my company. I want someone who can teach me, but isn’t too proud to listen to my arguments either. I want someone who can take a joke, but who can also realize the seriousness of any situation. Most of all, I need Money to be responsible, patient, and responsive. I’m tired of the blank stares for extended periods of time, punctuated by panic and chaos… I need someone vibrant and alive, without being excessive.

I found a martial arts teacher. Jujitsu, to be precise.

His Lessons

His first lesson to me was to see money as more than just an abstract concept, which flows through some abstract economy… See it as a force, which I can direct. It flows through me, and it flows through everything around me. I can be stubborn about how it flows, disrupting its currents, and slowing it down, or I can relax, be responsive, and speed up its progress. He told me that money, like water, is stagnant and diseased when it is still, but vibrant and alive when it flows. Hoarding money causes it to go stagnant, but if you let all of it go, then when the lean times come, I won’t have anything to support myself… Keeping it in motion without letting it slip away is a great balancing act, but if we understand how to keep it flowing while in our hands, then it is nearly effortless.

He also used an analogy of opening a door with two knobs. If I pulled on the knob closest to the hinges, then I’m wasting energy just to get the door in motion. If I pull on the knob furthest from the hinge, then I may have to pull further, but the door will be much easier to open. If I seek money closest to the storehouse of money, i.e., the corporations, then I will have a very hard time getting that door open, but if I go away from that storehouse, and find my own unique handle, then the door opens much more easily.

He also told me to program, since that is my strength… but don’t force the programming, let it come. Simply keep myself in the right position, ready to act, comfortable, and when a problem presents itself, sidestep it and push it where it needs to go from behind. If the problem attacks me, move its force, so that it stops being a problem.

It is all a lot to think about, and I have many lessons to learn, but this new Money has promised to give me lessons that are only barely out of my reach, and as I master them, I will have the ability to apply them more thoroughly than I thought possible before.

Physically, New Money is a white male, skinny and toned. He appears to be in his mid-thirties, with smile lines accenting his eyes. He has an air of confidence that comes from within, rather than with what he gains from outside of himself. He never acts out of desperation or fear, but he is always calm, happy, and at peace, even when he is gathering energy and showing off his lightning fast moves and feats of skill.

Other Abstracts

This exercise has prompted me to examine many of the other abstract concepts in my life in greater detail. Reading the comments on Slade’s blog about other people’s experiences in this area has also led to greater thinking, and I’m at the cusp of a decision.

Many years ago, I performed an experiment where I created a pantheon of gods, based partly on my limited understanding of the Greek and Roman systems, with a heavy polarity between good and evil as a throwback from my then-recent experiences with Christianity. The gods began acting on their own accord, after I had named each of them, which leads me to a concept of “Willful Invention.” Many people recognize this as the Law of Attraction, as Intention Manifestation, or as Magick… What if we aren’t limited to influencing things on the physical and spiritual planes, but that we can also create real deities?

My Path

Now, I don’t want to start a new religion… That isn’t my purpose. I could, however, provide a framework for others to work out their own personal pantheons of the abstract entities working within their own lives. Just as with this experiment with Money, we could change our relationships with these abstracts, and even change their basic qualities.

Jung has identified several abstract concepts that are easily personified, in the form of the Anima/Animus, as well as the Shadow. It may not be wise to change the behavior of these integral parts of our own psyche, but we can change our relationships with them, understand them, and learn from them. There are plenty of external abstract entities out there as well, such as corporations and institutions who we can personify so that we can talk with them directly and understand them… Maybe a corporation really isn’t soulless… Its soul simply isn’t listened to.

I’ll continue this experiment in the comments section… Please, join in, because, as Money has told me, a weight carried by many is easier to handle than the same weight carried by only one.

This post was started about a month ago… I finally got the last piece of the puzzle today, so rather than posting the regularly scheduled message on time management, here’s this one. It’s a long read, but enjoy.

I have been thinking of some of the more difficult questions. “What is the nature of God?” “Why do I smoke?” “Why was I a soldier?” They are all the same question, and it has taken me a long time to realize that.

Answering questions has always been easy for me. Finding the right questions has consistently been where I get in trouble… so I went out and interviewed people who have perspectives that I am interested in… One simple question, in different variations: How has your area of expertise increased your peace, and what advice can you give for increasing joy?

I also played a bit of misdirection with the questions, as I let the interviewees know after they answered. Steve Pavlina caught it very quickly, and I suspect that he has been studying the stage magicians over in Las Vegas. Instead of asking how to increase joy, I asked how to pursue joy… The difference was subtle enough to change the question entirely, as I wanted these people to stress that pursuing joy was as futile as chasing a rainbow; you must bring it out from within yourself. Don’t take my word for it, though; listen to what these people have said.

The Interviews:

Steve Pavlina

Could you please explain how writing on the topic of Personal Development brought you peace in your life?

Writing on personal development doesn’t bring me peace. Instead peace is something I must bring to my writing. My sense of peace comes from realizing that my state of being is a choice. I suppose the underlying value there is intelligence. I find it more intelligent to be internally at peace than to be conflicted, so I make it a high priority in my life. Then I can work from a state of peace instead of for it.

What recommendations would you make to others who would be willing to follow your example in regards to pursuing peace?

Peace isn’t something you pursue. It’s something you create. It’s a conscious choice. You can choose to create peace, or you can choose to create conflict, stress, or other states. When you consciously chose peace, you take different actions than you would otherwise. Mainly you stop doing those things that give rise to a lack of peace. For example, instead of arguing with others, you accept them as they are and allow them to be. This isn’t an overnight process of course — it takes practice — but it is a learnable pattern that produces positive results.

Steve points out a few key concepts here, very neatly packaged into two small paragraphs. Without undue explanation, since I always play the fool when I attempt to put words in his mouth, I’d like to point out a few things. First, peace is a choice, not a result. He sees choosing peace as an intellectual decision, which means that he made a conscious choice to bring it into his writing (as he stated in the second question). Finally, he points out that it takes practice, but I certainly wouldn’t say that practicing peace is any kind of work or chore, since it brings so much joy.

On with the next interviewee.

Ester Wilson: Daily Drawings, Professional Site

I chose to ask Ester Wilson these two questions because art has always been a peaceful aspect of my life. I often feel that one of the first steps to increasing your peace is to take the time to appreciate what is around you, and when you have art around you, it becomes much easier to take that time. I also have some behind-the-scenes experiences in the creative process of art, though I haven’t taken the time to develop my own, vastly limited talents. If only I had asked her sooner; her insights are a real gem.

I’m flattered that you consider me as one of the people to ask these questions. I’m also not sure that I actually have an area of expertise - I feel like a beginner in life at best. But I’m happy to hear that you have been positively affected by some work that these hands have produced. As far as answering your question on art and peace, I’ll do my best:

I make art for the joy of creating something when nothing existed before. It’s the process of letting ideas, images, dreams and feelings merge into a solid form, which is produced on surface in color and value. During the process, my mind is often running a mile a minute, thinking about how things fit together. This “fitting together” is not just relating to images or art, necessarily, but how my life can relate to the bigger picture of life and how I can feel whole within the existence of everything around me. It is a journey of slow steps sometimes, to get to this feeling of completeness, but I get there by making art, and keeping an open mind that is receptive to all the little details that I need to learn in each moment. A drawing can teach me many lessons, which are life lessons if I have an open mind to it. For example, when I draw an outline to create an illusion of a figure on paper, my mind created that line to mark a space where the figure is and is not - a space inside of the figure, and a space outside of the figure has all been created just by a single line. But there are no real separating lines in life, only forms that contain their own space at the same time that they shape other forms around them. It reminds me of the way pressure from an environment will mold things within the environment according to how they can withstand the pressure, like the way that fish are designed a particular way to handle their environment in the most streamline way. I think the life lesson in that line drawing is the fact that we are all contributing to the formation of our environment, so our contribution to it does in fact matter, even if we don’t necessarily feel like it. Which in turn sets responsibility for our actions squarely on our own shoulders for doing the best we can at all times, no matter what it is we are doing.

People don’t need to follow my example to catch a kind of understanding. Creating art (or playing around with paint and brushes) is just where I devote a lot of time and energy, while at the same time, trying to figure out questions of existence and such. My curiosity forces me to look deeper, so I’m always trying to figure out “why”, and “how”, and “what for”. Anyone can reach their own answers to their own specific questions with any medium, it only takes curiosity and an open mind to listen to what is available to learn. I would just suggest that a starting place can be to notice things. Notice life. Slow down and pay attention to it as you are in it.

Like Steve, Ester starts her work knowing that she is bringing peace to it, and she finds joy in the process. Her description of how her mind sorts out abstract thoughts while she is drawing leads me to believe that she is entering the much coveted creative flow state that Steve mentions a few times in his blog post, and it seems that being in that creative state is more beneficial to her than what she is actually creating. It is the process, not the results, that are the creation.

Jennifer Lynn

I asked Jennifer because she is on the fast track to finding financial peace, something which very few people can do. Personally, I’m only starting on the path of financial responsibility, so asking her was just as much of a selfish request as it was for the benefit of my readers. I can absolutely agree with her about the feeling of dread that bills give when you aren’t dealing with them responsibly, and as I’m improving, I can see the peace that comes from dealing with them quickly.

Could you please explain how managing your finances and blogging about it brought you peace in your life?

I feel the basic premise boils down to taking responsibility. Previously, I used to dread receiving a bill in the mail. It would immediately be stashed in an ever-growing pile. I’d silently avert my eyes for as long as possible, knowing full well my dire limited financial situation and the havoc that would ensue after paying the darn thing.

I finally reached a point when I thought, “Enough is enough. This helpless feeling is ridiculous. I need to start taking control here.”

I find that when I’m able to understand a concept, it no longer frightens or affects me quite the same way. Thus I began to dig into any information I could find on personal financing. Rationally I knew that there must be some sort of universal laws which govern a person’s ability to wealth and financial peace. I thought, once I can grasp these simple laws which govern each of our money, I will no longer feel helpless and afraid.

I used to live with an extremely limited view that only a select few privileged individuals were able to find financial security. The rest of us were doomed to a lifetime of struggling to remain afloat while coping with the burden of debt.

However, the more I read from different sources, the more knowledge I acquired. The more the veil was lifted.

Suddenly I realized that *I* controlled my finances. And with proper nurturing and respect, my delicate financial seeds would one day brilliantly bloom into a dazzling garden of security.

What recommendations would you make to others who would be willing to follow your example in regards to pursuing peace?

Knowledge is the key that unlocks so much. Through careful contemplation and self-examination, one can find much-needed peace within themselves.

My biggest piece of advice is, become proactive. Actively seek wisdom.

Jennifer didn’t point out to me that she caught the misdirection right away, but she did point out that peace is found within the self, through understanding rather than actively pursuing. Some of the other parts that I found particularly striking and insightful were how she overcomes fear through knowledge, and as she gained more understanding, she was able to gain power over her personal finances and is able to manage them with respect and maturity.

Jeff Lilly

I chose to ask Jeff these questions because he has been an inspiration to me spiritually and intellectually. Discussing symbolism and the deeper meanings of life have helped me to form my current view of reality, and he has challenged many of my more radical musings, as well as reintroduced me to some concepts that I had forgotten about.

1: Could you please explain how your path as a Druid, as well as your study of linguistics, brought you peace in your life?

The greatest way in which Druidism has brought more peace is in helping me get more in-tune with the passing seasons and the tides of life. The seasonal holidays have a way of marking the passing of time in a very visceral way, and holidays that I have passively celebrated all my life, like Christmas, take on a much deeper significance when they’re tied to the march of the Earth. Also, Druidism has given me tools with which to communicate with the gods — and this communication has been of tremendous value to me.

That said, I should note that when I need a quick “shot” of peace, Buddhist meditations are still the most effective for me. This may change as I get deeper into Druidism.

The study of linguistics?… It’s been important in allowing me to place my religious experiences into the wider context of human culture. I could imagine that if I knew no linguistics, and I didn’t have the language = religion metaphor, I might be struggling intellectually to explain my experiences and those of others. Also, it has helped me tremendously to be a better parent, which of course raises the overall peace level in my life.

2: What recommendations would you make to others who would be willing to follow your example in regards to pursuing peace?

Clearly, the best advice would be to get a degree in linguistics, read extensively in comparative religion, study and practice Buddhism in depth, and then become a Druid.

Seriously, my personal path has involved a lot of study, most of it self-inflicted, and I wouldn’t recommend it to everybody. The greatest lesson I have learned about finding peace is that you have to contact Spirit and ask for guidance. Contact Spirit however you like — working within the religious system in which you find yourself is probably the easiest way, but it’s not the only option, especially if your current religious system isn’t working out — but get into contact and listen. It’s trying to reach you, it’s trying to guide you! Meet it halfway, and let it show you the path.

I think that Jeff’s words speak for themselves.

A Few More Thoughts

Before I get to the hard questions of the nature of spirituality, I would like to point out a few recurring themes that I have been coming across this last month. (Edit: Two months ago, now)

First, revenge is never sweet, no matter what form it takes. A couple of weeks ago, my wife (Trina) and I got into a disagreement. I don’t remember what the disagreement was about, probably about the proper spelling of a word, but I do remember that I was right, for once. (It was probably the first disagreement in several months where I actually was right.) I held it over Trina’s head for that day, until she snapped at me for being such a jerk. It seemed that even when I was right, I was still wrong. Well, last night (as I am writing this section, not last night from when I’m publishing it), I had a chance for revenge. Unfortunately for both Trina and myself, I took that chance. Trina was pointing out that she’s not always right, and I pushed the events of two weeks ago into her face, where even when she was wrong, she was still right, because I had gone about things the wrong way. Well, I meant to just point out the ‘facts’ as I saw them, but she read my emotions using intuition in a way that I will probably never understand. (I swear that she is empathic, although she will always deny it, due to how skeptical she is.) I had my revenge by pointing out that she wasn’t being fair, but in order to do that, I had to bring myself much further down below her level.

Second, I would like to talk about my style of getting things done, and what is wrong with it. I have a habit of mulling things over for a long time, thinking about them in the back of my mind. This is great for coming to conclusions quickly, because my thoughts are never still… I’m always working out bits and pieces of problems as I go along, so when I need an answer, I’m already most of the way to it. Unfortunately, this isn’t very effective for actually getting things done, only for solving questions. The habit of sitting back until I’m ready to act means that I rarely act. I’m usually in a state of being almost ready, but not quite. Precession pushes this stillness into procrastination, and it forms a habit. So, for the next thirty days, I’ll be working on doing things as soon as I think of them, and to keep myself motivated, I’ll be making a log of my progress. (The observant will probably have already seen the log pop up a few days ago.) It will help to schedule some time where I look around and figure out what needs to be done.

Finally, before I get into the real meat of this post, I would like to say something concerning peace that I’m not certain that I have made clear before. This is delving a bit into politics, but that isn’t my focus. (Personally, I think that politics is just a way to manage your environment when true peace is impossible, which is why I try to avoid it.) Peace has a few prerequisites. Foremost among them is liberty. Now, you could be chained against a wall and still be able to find peace, because you recognize that everybody has one sovereign place where they are always free: their own mind. Personally, I don’t recommend taking such drastic measures to find the only place where true peace comes from, and very very few people actually do find peace when they are restrained. You must have liberty, even if it is only liberty with your own thoughts, in order to experience peace. There are a lot of things in this world that rid a person of liberty, with war being one of the most obvious. Debt reduces liberty. The impression that ’stuff’ will bring you happiness is very disempowering. Fighting for peace reduces your liberty. Resisting those who would take away your liberty through non-violence and using violence to resist are completely separate, and only one can bring you the liberty required for peace. Violence begets violence, no matter what the intention.

Now, on to the real meat of this post.

I have been asking myself what the nature of God is for a long while. At times, God appeared as the jealous, hateful, warmongering god of Abraham and of the fundamentalists that followed in the lines of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. At other times, God appeared as the Tao, calm, acting without acting, and omnipresent, rather than simply omnipotent. Other times still, God appeared as the dual god and goddess of Wicca, having many personalities, more human than the intangible views of God that many other religions hold. Finally, there still sits in the back of my mind the God of love that I grew up with, modeled after the contemporary Christian view that I knew as a child. There is also one more set of gods that make up God, which are unique to myself.

About nine years ago, just before my eighteenth birthday, I performed an experiment on the spiritual realm. I created a pantheon of gods, and gave them rules that they live by. The primary rule was that each god became the custodian of the souls of those who worshiped them, and as they gained souls, they increased in power. I created a very diverse pantheon, with basic personalities for each, as well as a name, and I was beginning to write a mythology behind them when something strange began to happen.

The gods began to come to life.

Objectively, as near as I could tell, nothing changed. Subjectively, though, everything changed. These gods began to speak to me in my imagination, each one matching their personality, yet adding more flavor than I had given them originally. Two gods, most of all, stood out from the rest; the god who’s purpose was to protect and guide the lost souls, and the god of cruelty and pettiness. They didn’t manifest directly, but as I continued the experiment, I had a lot of coincidences pop up, just as alpha reflections show up before the full manifestation. As it went further, the coincidences became stronger, including the alternator on my truck going bad.

Was I fishing for these coincidences, attributing them to the gods I had created as they showed up? Objectively, I can not say one way or another. Subjectively, though, these gods were real, and used far more influence than the stand-offish gods of the older religions.

What does that say about the nature of God? I’m not entirely certain. I stopped the experiment shortly after my truck died. What does it say about me? That I was young, foolish, and needed to learn a lesson. It also showed me that I had a power that I couldn’t comprehend. As I went on and studied Wicca, I used my familiarity with talking to gods as a stepping stool to talking with spirits and for energy manipulation, though I very rarely used magick to create or attract. Instead, I helped other people to manifest, giving them the impression that I was doing the magick for them, but as soon as I felt their own power, I would let them take over. A lot of people gave me full credit for work that I only facilitated and gently guided. In giving others the ability to use their own powers, I denied myself the experience that I needed for myself.

I turned away from Wicca unfulfilled, but certainly not bitter. I had created my own circumstances, and the religion did exactly as it promised. I left humbler and wiser. I explored Christianity again, but I didn’t find anything that I hadn’t learned about before. I touched on the concepts of a few Eastern philosophies, but I didn’t participate in their religions. I finally settled in as an Universalist, and I ministered to the pagans I knew.

After leaving the Army, I didn’t have anyone to minister to, and the dominant church in the area, which I enjoyed in other regions, was populated by very bigoted, narrow minded people where I had moved to. I turned away from spirituality for a while in order to organize some of my other pursuits, especially education. A lot changed when I found Steve Pavlina’s site, and even more changed when I volunteered to moderate the Spirituality subforum. I finally found a place where people were routinely asking the hard questions and sharing their spiritual experiences openly. Just before Steve and Erin’s forums opened, I found my life purpose. In case you can’t guess, and you haven’t read any of my previous posts, my purpose is to bring peace to everybody. This purpose is tied very closely to my life as a soldier, having seen the demilitarized zone separating North and South Korea, as well as having been a soldier during the attack on the World Trade Center.

This blog is a direct application of my purpose. It is doing several things for me. It allows me to share my ideas for peace with others, and acts as a focus for others to share their own ideas for peace. (But, it can only be that focus if people leave comments. I honestly can not conceive of competition in the goal to increase peace, so if you feel inspired, then by all means, leave a few words.) One plan for this blog is for it to eventually supply some semi-passive income, so that I can move further out and give speeches directly, spreading peace more actively. Unfortunately, traffic is somewhat slow still, and along with the slowdown associated with changing domain names, I still have not received my first adsense check. I am slowly building momentum, though, so the blog will be profitable soon. Hopefully, it will be profitable enough that I can devote my full attention to it soon.

Most importantly, this blog is helping me to learn, and it is keeping me accountable to my own ideals. Because of this blog, I have learned some very important lessons, such as how helpful cleaning is to maintaining joy, and it has pointed out how much I have procrastinated in the past, and how damaging it was. I have also gained a lot of insight into spiritual matters, including the nature of evil, and recently, the nature of God.

I would like to share with you the results of some of my more recent meditations. I’ll start with my most recent one, since it was the most troubling. Last night (again, as I’m writing this section, not from when I am publishing the post), I was writing the section talking about the necessity for liberty to achieve peace. I got stuck on a very difficult question, namely, if the most notable people who have achieved peace have all had to suffer before their realization, then what is the point of pursuing peace at all? If we must feel deep, devastating emotional or physical pain before we come to the realization that we can have peace within ourselves, then is it worth it to even attempt to spread peace?

For several minutes, I could only think of images from the Holocaust, of those walking skeletons and their unimaginable suffering. I remembered the one man who had walked out of those camps, having achieved peace, and I wondered what could possibly make all of that horror worth it. Finally, I entered a meditation, and quested out for a person who had been through the concentration camps. A girl came to me, about 9 years old, with a small red dress, though it was obvious that she had the perspective of someone beyond the veil. I asked her why she went through the Holocaust, and she told me that it was so that the experience can benefit people, both her own soul, and for those who would later bear witness to it.

Now, here was an even tougher question. How could I propose to benefit from anyone’s suffering, even if that suffering was meant as an example? I’m just a computer nerd who likes to wax philosophical, who has seen suffering second hand and decided to do something about it. I’m not worthy to pick up the torch and resist suffering directly; I can only give advice to help others relieve their own suffering.

I posted a question on the forums, and had a troubled night’s sleep. In the morning, I found a few good answers, and here is what I make of it all. Humans go through a cycle of suffering and peace, which strengthens us, just as iron is tempered by alternating heat and cold. If a person receives too much suffering, they commit suicide, just as iron melts when it gets too hot. If the iron is cooled carelessly, it becomes brittle and weak, just as people who do not find peace after they suffer become bitter and cruel.

It is counter-productive to try to speed up the process by causing people to suffer. We do not know how far along the path anybody is, and if we push them too far, we will do more damage than good. It also happens to be entirely distasteful to me to increase anyone’s suffering. So long as the ego exists unchecked, people will experience their own suffering, with no help from the outside world. Bringing peace, however, is the tricky part. That is where the real art is, especially since we must walk such a fine line while doing so. The choice for peace must come from the individual, else there is no liberty, and no peace. At the same time, though, we need to be available to help any who do reach out their hands.

Bringing peace becomes less of a goal and more of a process. I knew before that my work wouldn’t be done in my lifetime, but now I know that it will continue for as long as humanity exists. I don’t see it as futile, since it will never have an end. Quite the contrary, if it did have an end, then it would be futile. Remember that both Steve and Ester pointed out that peace is in the process, not the product. Humanity will continue to grow, which is a much better alternative to reaching a high point, then stagnating.

As for the nature of God. God is subjective. God exists, but perhaps not in a form that we would recognize from Sunday school classes. My experiment with creating gods showed me that I have creative powers, even if those powers are limited to within my own experiences… and I shied away from those creative powers for a very long time. God is exactly as you envision. God is as cruel as you believe. God is as loving as you believe. God is as many separate deities, or as few, as you believe. You create God. Spiritual matters are highly subjective, which is why some people hold them to be as plain as day, while others hold them to be completely farcical. Both are right, because the God which one has created is as real as the lack of God that the other has created. God is loving to those who show love. God is hateful to those who show hate. God is indifferent to those who are indifferent. If you look in the mirror and study yourself, the eyes staring back at you, studying you, are God. Thou art God. You create your reality, whether consciously or not, so you deserve the title, and all of the responsibility and benefits associated.

Of course, that is just my subjective answer. Your own God may have a completely different one.

If you have watched television or movies consistently at any point in your life, chances are, you have heard about meditation, and how it, supposedly, helps to bring you peace.

The problem is, few people are ‘trained’ to meditate, and many people feel that it is a waste of time, even though they have never given it a fair trial. Now, what is the point of holding an opinion if that opinion isn’t an informed one? Is is so that you can be proven wrong?

I can’t really tell you the benefits of meditation unless you have also experienced deep meditation. If you have had deep meditations before, then you already know of the benefits directly, so there is no point in me explaining what those benefits are. Let nobody say that I don’t engage in pointless activities in the hopes that somehow, maybe, it won’t be pointless after all.

I’m going to dispense with the technical jargon that researches use to describe meditation. This is the only paragraph where you’ll see words like alpha-state, beta waves, and the like. Jargon exists for two reasons: to shorten a well known concept for easy communication among those who know that concept, and to confuse the rest. If I said “The method ‘float DivideUnsafe(int,int)’ in the class BasicMath throws an exception when a zero is passed as the second argument,” most of you out there would stare at me blankly, wanting to run away. A much smaller segment will know exactly what I said, and will tell me one of three effective solutions to that problem. Such is the power of jargon, that if I tried to explain the same concept without using specialized definitions designed by programmers, that it would take me several paragraphs to describe what I said in one sentence. Instead of using the jargon, I’ll use the layman terms so that everyone (myself included) can understand.

So, what is meditation, in easily digestible terms? It is an exercise where you consciously control your thoughts, usually accompanied by breathing exercises, visualization, and sometimes with verbal cues. Some meditation techniques also involve movement, such as Yoga. Entering the creative flow state is also a form of meditation. The methods to achieve meditation are varied, and different methods achieve different results.

Probably the most recognized methods of meditation are where you sit cross-legged with a straight back, breath rhythmically, and attempt to clear your mind. Most people give this a try, and after a few attempts, give up because of the difficulty of suppressing random thoughts. The people who can use this method successfully have usually had others guide them in person, giving them handy bits of advice as each mental barrier is reached. Unfortunately, I don’t have free plane tickets laying around to help people who want to learn this method, and the written word is very poor at anticipating an individual’s needs, so this isn’t a method that I can teach effectively. Learning this method is a long struggle, but the rewards are there, and in many circumstances, the lessons learned are very useful, even more than the lessons learned from the highly visual meditations. Of course, each meditation method has its strengths and weaknesses, so even such a powerful method as clearing your mind completely may not be the best choice for your circumstances.

Even though I can’t teach you how to learn mind clearing meditation techniques, I can help you learn how to use visualization meditations. These meditations can range all of the way from simply using your imagination, all the way to deep, trance like, full sensory meditations. Yes, you can meditate on eating, and be able to taste the food, feel it as you chew on it, smell it, see it, and if food made any noise, even hear it. That, however, takes a lot of practice to master, but it is within anyone’s ability, if they do indeed practice.

Tangent: I was considering putting a cliff hanger here to whet your appetite for more information, but I figured that it would be a bit counter-productive, since I can just type for a few more hours and have the entire post ready within a couple of days. Also, with how badly I procrastinate at times, if I don’t finish the article now, I don’t know if I ever will.

Here is the primary benefit of meditation. You’ll find it easier to control your emotions. I guarantee that, if you get nothing else out of meditation, that being able to control your emotions will more than repay you for the time that you spend practicing. Meditation also opens the door to some amazing insight into your own thought process. Now, who doesn’t like understanding themselves? Anybody?

I do have a word of warning, though. When I set out to learn how to meditate, I was very impatient. Please don’t make the same mistake that I made. Meditation is a skill that takes months to learn and a lifetime to master. I’m going to present you with a few easy steps, but take a month to work on each of these steps, rather than trying to master them all in a weekend.

The first step is to learn how to visualize objects. Close your eyes and hold a mental picture of a very simple object, such as a ball or a block. Imagine the object using all of your senses, including how it feels, smells, tastes, looks, and even how it sounds. (For objects that don’t naturally make noise, ask how it would sound if you dropped it on the floor.) Is its texture smooth or rough? Does it feel like wood, plastic, rubber, or glass, or some entirely different material? Hold that mental image in your mind for as long as possible, with all of your senses, until you can’t concentrate on it any more. Don’t be discouraged if you can only hold the simple object in your mind for a few seconds. For this first month, just work on being able to hold the image in your mind for as long as possible, up to about five minutes.

The second step is to expand your visualization. Think of more complex objects, such as leaves, feathers, and keyboards. Imagine as much detail as you can, such as the veins of the leaves and feathers, and the texture of the keys, and how some keys are smoother than others, and still other keys have their letters rubbed off. During this month, concentrate on expanding the detail of the objects, while maintaining the length of the visualization.

The third step is to multiply your visualizations. Think of many objects. While thinking of a leaf, add a feather. Make them interact, touching each other, pulling at each other, etc. Add a keyboard to the scene, then another complex object, until you can not add any more. During this, maintain the level of detail and the length of the visualization. By the end of this month, eight fully detailed objects in a scene for five minutes is very good progress.

The fourth step is to enter the visualization. The great thing about meditation is that you can see yourself from a first person perspective and third person perspective at the same time. While maintaining the number of objects, level of detail, and length of the visualization, take this month to practice interacting with the objects using your representation inside the meditation.

After this, you should be skilled enough to do any visualization meditation with proficiency. You can go ahead and relax the level of detail, because you will be working with far more objects than just the eight that most people can handle at full detail, but keep up the practice, so that your skills stay sharp. Perhaps for your first full meditation, you could invite your subconscious to take a human form and you can have a conversation.

I’ll also post a few of my favorite guided meditations, which I use as springboards to enter a deep meditative state. Stay tuned for these updates.